Ref. : E&R/Press/’05/jsd-dg/10
CERC Stresses Need for Regulatory Body
on Food Safety and Nutrition
Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC), Ahmedabad, in a representation
made to the Union Ministry of Food Processing Industries, has underlined
the need for an effective regulatory authority to monitor the fulfilment
of food safety, nutrition, labelling and such other requirements by
producers and distributors. These provisions are absent in the present
Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Act 1954, CERC has added. The
Ministry had sought CERC’s views and suggestions on the Food
Safety and Standards Bill 2005.
CERC said the PFA Act deals largely with the prevention of adulteration,
particularly prosecution for the violation of the Act. It does not
deal with the nutritional aspects nor does it provide for compensation
to consumers for loss, injury or death because of non-compliance with
the Act. Also there is no provision for disgorgement of unjust enrichment
or class action suits against producers or distributors of unsafe,
substandard or underweight food products and/or false or misleading
advertising, or sale of spurious or counterfeit food products.
Civil Remedy
Many industrially developed countries resort to prosecution only
if consumer safety is affected and not for any and every violation
of the law. CERC said that, fortunately, in the Indian context, the
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, amended 1991, provides for class action
suits. Such civil remedies, which may require the producer and/or
distributor to disgorge millions of rupees, would be a far stricter
deterrent than prosecution. Most prosecutions involve milk and dairy
products, edible oils, spices and soft drinks and, after a number
of years of court trial, 85 per cent of the prosecutions end up in
acquittal or discharge.
The Act provides for a deterrent punishment of minimum six months’
imprisonment if the offender is convicted for non-compliance with
the Act. If the magistrate does not award him the minimum imprisonment,
he has to explain in writing. But, often instead of a written explanation,
magistrates prefer to discharge or acquit the accused, defeating the
object of the law. Whatever other fine, penalty or shorter imprisonment
would have been normally awarded is also lost because the magistrate
prefers not to provide an explanation. All concerned, therefore, need
a self-introspection of what they have achieved through the Act vis-a-vis
consumer health and safety.
The Stockholm Convention identified 12 persistent organic pollutants
(POPs) which have since been recommended to be banned. The DDT is
one of them. But several of our food standards provide for permissible
levels of DDT residues. “We should fix some time limit after
which POPs will not be allowed to be used,” CERC said in its
representation.
Many industrially advanced countries have also prescribed lower permissible
limits for pesticide residues in food for children from the age of
six months to 18 years linked with their body weight. India has not
yet chosen to formulate stricter standards for the purpose.
Labelling Information
The Justice Venkatachalliah Committee recommended some prescribed
standards for nutritional values and labelling information on food
products. CERC added that the Bill should provide for compulsory minimum
nutritional value and the graded balance for higher nutritional values
in three to five years. Cautions and warnings should also be included
for consumers such as pregnant women, children, persons suffering
from blood pressure, diabetes and heart ailments.
CERC added that registered consumer associations should have a locus
standi to file and conduct the proceedings on their own behalf and
on behalf of an aggrieved consumer or class of consumers who have
suffered loss, injury or death on account of unsafe or substandard
food and food products.
Date : 29/03/2005
Place : Ahmedabad
Pritee Shah
Editor
INSIGHT - The Consumer Magazine
————————————————————————————————-
CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTRE
“Suraksha Sankool”, Thaltej, Sarkhej-Gandhinagar Highway,
Ahmedabad - 380 054 (INDIA)
Phone: 079-27489945-46 Fax: 079-27489947
E-mail: cerc@wilnetonline.net
Web Site: http://www.cercindia.org
————————————————————————————————-