Ref : E&R/Press/2004/gebacci_40/JSD
CERS Petitions to GERC for
Death of Innocent Citizens in Gujarat
Consumer Education and Research Society (CERS) had filed a petition
on 17 September 2002 before the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission
(GERC) for the death of innocent citizens due to the dropping of overhead
lines within the jurisdiction of the Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB).
Only one hearing took place on 1 May 2003 where, instead of accepting
the fault, the GEB questioned the jurisdiction of the GERC to take
these types of cases and the locus standi of CERS to file such cases.
The number of deaths continued unabated as no hearings were held nor
any order was passed by the Hon’ble Commission. CERS filed another
two petitions involving the number of deaths and requesting the GERC
to pass an early order so that further deaths of innocent citizens
can be avoided.
| Date of affidavit |
Date of accident |
Details of death |
| 28.11.2002 |
17.09.2002 |
4 men aged 23, 55, 58 & 18 years,
1 woman aged 21 years |
| 17.07.2003 |
June/July 2003 |
Death of 15 persons in Saurashtra & Kutch |
| 07.07.2004 |
07.09.2003 28.05.2004
04.06.2004 |
Woman of 37 years
Man of 40 years
Man of 22 years. |
| Present affidavit |
22.7.2004 |
1 boy of 10 years
1 girl of 10 years
and one adult man. |
The matter remained pending due to subsequent changes in the GERC
for appointment of Hon’ble Chairman and members.
CERS filed one more petition on 10 August 2004 complaining to the
GERC about the death of innocent children and a person who had tried
to save them from electric shock. The power supply in this case was
put off by the GEB on receiving complaint from a person for receiving
shock on his premises. After two hours the GEB switched on the supply
without investigating or attending the fault. The 11 KV overhead line
snapped from the jumper and dropped on the ground killing three persons
instantaneously.
CERS in its submission and presentation before the GERC has pointed
out that all overhead lines must have protective devices as per Indian
Electricity Rules 1956 whereby they get disconnected automatically
from incoming and outgoing supplies making the line dead so that it
does not harm anybody. The dropping of live overhead lines on the
ground proved that either such devices had not been provided or they
were not functioning.
CERS has requested the Hon’ble Commission to issue immediate
order to the GEB and the Chief Electrical Inspector to take measures
to prevent the death of innocent people.
The petitioner has complained to the GERC that the GEB has not taken
any measure to prevent electrical accidents which continue unabated
and is nothing but second degree murder of innocent citizens of Gujarat.
CERS has also requested the GERC to devise a formula in line with
the Motor Vehicles Act-1988 to pay compensation to the persons who
lost their lives due to negligence of the GEB.
CERS has requested the Hon’ble Commission to collect the amount
of compensation from the salaries of the staff/persons responsible
for the accident and has quoted a judgment of the National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission in the case of M/s. Padamsri Tobacco
vs. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. CERS has also
submitted the details of procedures being followed by the Karnataka
Electricity Regulatory Commission to penalise licensees for their
negligence and pay compensation to victims of the electrical accidents
in its submission dated 19 May 2003. The petitioner - CERS - has requested
the GERC to direct all licensees to provide data of the number of
electrical accidents occurred during the last three years. The petitioner
has demanded the appointment of an independent Committee of Energy
Experts and representatives of various consumer organisations to inquire
into each accident and the submission of report to the Hon’ble
Commission.
The petitioner submits that the Gujarat or State Act-2003 Sec.17
sub-section (K) empowers the Hon’ble Commission “to set
and enforce standards for the electrical industry in the State including
standards relating to safety, quality, continuity and reliability
of service.’’
Section 39 and sub-section 1&2 also empower the Commission to
impose penalty on licensees for non-compliance or violation on above
and pay compensation to such consumers or victims of the violation
of standards on safety.
The Supreme Court has given wide powers to State Electricity Regulatory
Commissions in the matter of West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission
Vs. Calcutta Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. and we requested the GERC
to issue immediate orders and protect the lives of innocent citizens
of Gujarat.
Date : 24/08/2004
Place : Ahmedabad
Pritee Shah
Editor
INSIGHT - The Consumer Magazine
————————————————————————————————
Opinions, test results and research findings issued through this Press
Release cannot be used in any form directly or indirectly for advertising,
promotional or commercial purpose.
CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY
“Suraksha Sankool”, Thaltej, Sarkhej-Gandhinagar Highway,
Ahmedabad - 380 054 (INDIA)
Phone: 079-27489945-46 Fax: 079-27489947
E-mail: cerc@wilnetonline.net
Web Site: http://www.cercindia.org
————————————————————————————————-