Ref : E&R/Press/‘04/Manish/JSD
Cargo Motors Told to Pay Rs
5 Lakh for
Youth’s Death
In a landmark judgement, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,
Ahmedabad has ordered Cargo Motors Ltd., Ahmedabad, to pay a Rs 5-lakh
compensation to the bereaved family of 28-year-old Manish Pathak for
causing his death while repairing his vehicle.
Consumer Education and Research Society (CERS), Ahmedabad, and Manish’s
mother Varshaben K. Pathak, his widow Pragna M. Pathak, his sisters
Siddhi and Riddhi, and child Viraj had filed a complaint with the
Commission against Cargo Motors Ltd.
On 19 October 1993, Manish went to Cargo Motors’ Service Station
at Aslali, Ahmedabad, for getting a matador repaired. The vehicle
was used for the transport of Gujarat Samachar copies from Ahmedabad
to Bhavnagar.
While the mechanic was repairing the vehicle by using a hammer, the
hammer broke and its iron pieces darted into the windpipe of Pathak.
He was rushed to the L.G Hospital, Maninagar, and was later shifted
to the V.S.Hospital for a surgery the same day. Manish died of injury
four days after the surgery.
The bereaved family approached CERS, which contended in the Commission
that a contract had existed between Cargo Motors and Manish for repairs
of vehicles. CERS stated it was the absolute duty of Cargo Motors
to take adequate care and failure to do so would amount to negligence
per se. Personal safety of the customer/consumer was part of the contract
of service. Reference has been made to a number of authorities in
support of the said assertions.
Cargo Motors replied that Manish was not the owner of the vehicle,
nor a customer of the company. They did not provide any service to
him and he was a stranger on its premises. No privity of contract
existed between Manish and Cargo Motors. The mechanic was repairing
the pump and automiser of the vehicle, for which a hammer was not
used at all. Manish had sustained injury on his neck outside the workshop.
The Commission concluded that Manish was both a consumer and beneficiary
of the repairs undertaken by Cargo Motors. Cargo Motors failed to
furnish affidavits of the mechanic and the receptionist in the service
station who would have supported the stand of the company. The Foreman
of Cargo Motors brought Manish to the L.G.Hospital and stated that
nobody intentionally caused him injury. Manish’s statements
taken by the police, also corroborated the evidence produced and his
statement clearly unfolded the story as set out in the complaint.
The Commission directed Cargo Motors to pay Rs. 5 lakh to the bereaved
family with 6 per cent interest from the date of complaint till payment
and Rs. 10,000 as cost. Out of the amount to be paid by Cargo Motors,
Rs. 3 lakh should be invested in long-term deposit or Monthly Income
Scheme of Postal Department. The interest accrued through it was to
be spent for the welfare of Manish’s child. The remaining amount
had to be distributed equally between his mother and his widow.
Date : 15/09/2004
Place : Ahmedabad
Pritee Shah
Editor
INSIGHT - The Consumer Magazine
————————————————————————————————
Opinions, test results and research findings issued through this Press
Release cannot be used in any form directly or indirectly for advertising,
promotional or commercial purpose.
CONSUMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY
“Suraksha Sankool”, Thaltej, Sarkhej-Gandhinagar Highway,
Ahmedabad - 380 054 (INDIA)
Phone: 079-27489945-46 Fax: 079-27489947
E-mail: cerc@wilnetonline.net
Web Site: http://www.cercindia.org
————————————————————————————————-